news & events

The layers of the onion
08/09/2011

Onlangs werd ons de vraag gesteld of bedrijven ook het gevoel hebben dat schoolgaande jeugd heeft bij de start van Q4: het nieuw werkjaar met frisse energie en gedrevenheid aanvatten om er een mooi succes van te maken.

Een pak doelstellingen zal nog dienen gerealiseerd te worden de komende maanden, en er wordt best voor voldoende 'proof of evidence' gezorgd voor de geplande evaluatierondes op het eind van de refentieperiode.

Volgend artikel illustreert goed de sfeer van dit seizoen en de bijhorende gesprekken tijdens deze evaluatiecyclus:

Conducting a productive conversation requires that the manager understand each of the levels and know how to ask questions that really open up the issues. Here's a look at how the various layers of the "onion" relate to reviews.

Performance is the place where too many reviews end.

Performance is too often viewed merely in the context of data, whether hard sales figures or evidence from a 360 that the employee is regarded by direct reports as poor at collaboration, for example. Data are important, but they're hardly exhaustive. You can get behind the data by asking the employee to talk about a time when his performance excelled or to talk about some recent results. Ideally you will arrive at a deep mutual understanding of what constitutes good performance, and both you and the employee will be able to place the data in that context.

Situation refers to the circumstances and conditions in which the employee works.

Ask if the employee feels more confident in some situations, and if so, which ones. Probing along these lines should yield valuable insights that can help you create conditions in which the employee can excel.

Motivation is often assumed to be difficult to discuss...

... but the right questions can tell you what drives or inhibits the employee: What do you like to do/not like to do? How do you set goals for yourself? How do you respond to setbacks?

Skills are surprisingly more difficult to probe than motivation.

Despite the assumptions and inferences that accompany "strength and weakness" reviews, it's far easier for people to say they don't like something than to say they can't do something. Make it clear you understand that strengths and weaknesses depend on context. A strength—decisiveness, for example—might be seen as a weakness in a context calling for collegiality. Instead of confronting someone on "weaknesses," pursue the topic in those relative terms and in specific contexts.

Experience should not be restricted to employee's current job...

... but should include anything he or she might have done. Ask such questions as: "Tell me about the most challenging or satisfying project on which you have worked in your entire career," or "What do you consider to be your top three career achievements?" The answers will not only speak volumes about the employee's values and accomplishments but might also offer opportunity for capitalizing on strengths that might not otherwise have come to light.

Bron: vrij naar www.businessweek.com - Performance reviews, it's about 'how', not 'why'.


Progreso Talent & Performance Management Software faciliteert het evaluatieproces, zowel wat de workflow betreft, de vergelijking met vorige reviews, de link naar competentieontwikkeling in het kader van nieuwe doelstellingen, carrièrepaden of successie management. We werken snel en efficiënt, zodat u nog voor de komende evaluatierondes maximaal kunt inzetten op de dialoog met uw mensen terwijl het proces op een gebruiksvriendelijke en visuele manier wordt ondersteund door de Progreso software.